Celtics shouldn’t win
Filed Under (Basketball, Sports) by viellissimo on 16-06-2008
Tagged Under : Basketball, Boston, Championship, Garnett, Lakers, NBA, paul pierce
The Boston Celtics are just one win away from grabbing the NBA Finals trophy for this 2007-2008 season. The series is headed back to Boston for Game 6 (and Game 7 if necessary) and will determine who tops this season full of mid-season blockbuster trades, playoff surprises (Atlanta Hawks and New Orleans). The Big Three of the Celtics (Garnett, Allen and Pierce) will try to suppress and end the efforts of the Lakers’ own Big Three (Kobe, Odo and Gasol), or maybe try stopping Phil Jackson make history as the coach who has the most NBA title (10th if his Lakers will win the series). Yet, as a Lakers supporter (for the meantime..), here are the reasons why the Boston Celtics is not deserving of an NBA title:

My primary reason is that the Boston Celtics of today will NEVER EVER win against the Celtics of the 80s nor with the Celtics of the 60s. It is for the sole reason that even without a Big Three (only Larry Bird was the legitimate “superstar” of the team), the Boston Celtics of the 80s have won the 3 most recent championships they have, and who would forget the Celtics’ own Bill Russell who earned the first 11 titles (Celtics Total Championship: 14) with the help of Bob Cousy in the 60s, while the Boston Celtics of today struggled in the first round against a young Atlanta Hawks team (Boston has a franchise best 66 wins). Paul Pierce was the only original superstar of this Celtics, so take away Garnett and Allen from the picture and I definitely assure that the Celtics would’ve never gotten past the Atlanta Hawks in the first round. Paul Pierce is just not a leader material. Yes he’s a very good player, but not a championship caliber player.
This year’s LA Lakers deserve the title more than this year’s Celtics. From the tremendous but wonderful change of Kobe Bryant into a “real” leader who passes, dishes, motivates and orchestrates the Lakers into a championship caliber team, the Los Angeles Lakers have just proven the whole world that even without Shaq, it just took them 4 years to regroup and reform the old Lakers back. With the addition of Pau Gasol and rejoining of Derek Fisher, we can look forward to a much exciting Lakers team next season, after they win or lose this year’s NBA Finals, especially with the expected return of Andrew Bynum.
The Boston Celtics however were filled with veteran superstars who
never got the chance to go to the NBA Finals in their career. Kevin Garnett and Ray Allen, both basketball superstars and Olympic Gold medalists from the 2000 US Men’s Senior Basketball team, were feeling the need to form a team that will enable them to reach the NBA Finals for the first time in their career, because they aren’t getting any younger right? So Kevin Garnett left the Minnesota Timberwolves (his home for 12 years) and his teammates to go for his own glory and Ray Allen left the Supersonics after both their former teams produced consecutive seasons of heartaches and disappointments. As much as I believe, they left their team in order to find a team that’ll get them a championship ring. The point is, they WERE their team’s leader. And as a leader, for me to leave your teammates just like that, ain’t worthy of a championship. Especially with the addition of Sam Cassell and PJ Brown (both “superveterans”) who, again, just joined the Celtics after the midseason (since they believed that Celtics will now certainly give them a championship ring after seeing the league-leading record of the Celtics so far) in order to get championship credits. That really annoys me. (These were also the reasons why I didn’t want the Miami Heat to get a championship last 2006)

If both teams’ Big Three were cut down to just one, say only Kobe and Pierce face-off and lead their team up against each other in the Finals, don’t expect Pierce to be smiling at the end of the series.
Related Posts:





what a weird blog?! who ever wins the championship deserves it! you dont talk bout who the players are in a team that should win or not…. or a player better than another player to deserve a championship… both teams played all season long… both management went tru millions of calls to make their team a contender… they both went tru 3 rounds of grueling playoff basketball… the system sounds fair to me… so why take anything away from the celtics?
maybe the 80s celtics are a bit better than the present… or maybe not… how can you tell? is the level of competition back then same as now? come on!
Kobe is a great player no doubt about that… but as a leader? what are you saying…. he leads the lakers now that he abandoned last summer…. remember he asked for a trade…pierce stuck with the team…the team just rewarded him two great players… while kobe… he got rewarded by having gasol… he was rewarded by his ability… while pierce by his loyalty… whats wrong with that?
and besides.. were talking about a team here… a team wins the rings…. not a player! comparing kobe and pierce for the championship ain’t ryt…. you should compare the LA as a whole and Boston… there is no “I” in a Team!
Who wins deserve to win….
for me, if the championship will just be given to the deserving team, the team that deserves it the most is the boston celtics. (yeah, eventhough i a bigtym laker fan) since day 1, every celtic player has been committed. its not just thinking that they can win the championship, but putting hard work and dedication to be able to attain it.
y compare the celtics of old to the new boston celtic and say that todays boston team is not deserving? each boston win is a product of hardwork and team effort. just like any other team’s win.
even the worst team in nba is deserving to be champion coz to be champs, u actually have to work on it, its not like submitting a strong line-up then saying that we should win coz were a stronger team. =)
bottom line is, the C’s deserves to be champs, for me, they are the most hardworking team and deserves to be called champs in that aspect alone, from the start of training camp, nobody in the lakers were thinking that they are gona be champs this season, but bynum improved and the addition of Gasol made them a better team and its all good fortune for the Lakers, but that doesnt end there, each game they’re trying to play the best they can like the C’s and win 4 games in the finals, ain’t that deserving enough?
to inchik, kobe is a good leader, move on man, kobe asking for a trade was a history, what, just because he asked to be traded since he felt that the management is not doing their job means he cannot lead a team?
hakeem olajuwon actually did the same when he was in houston, asking for a trade but it never happen. as a result championships for the rockets. now who else could lead that team? =)
its just that when your team is down, changes are needed to be made, and someone needs to voice it out.
i agree with intsik. and how dare you made a blog like this???
the boston celtics of this season is just a newly formed team that was only assembled at the beginning of the season. why the hell compare it with Bird’s and Russell’s celtics???
back at Russell’s time, there was no three-point shot and some basketball rules are still being revolutionized.
when the celtics rule during Larry Bird’s era, there was also the original Big Three composed of Bird, Kevin McHale and Robert Parish. It wasn’t Bird doing it all for the C’s during that time.
i also agree with intsik regarding the leadership issue you said of Kobe with the Lakers and Pierce with the Celtics.
another fact mr viellissimo, Ray Allen was traded to the Boston Celtics for the 5th overall pick (Jeff Green) while Garnett was traded to the Celtics for Al Jefferson, Gerald Green and some players (i forgot their names). they didn’t left their former teams just for their own glory, their formet teams traded them for both parties’ own success in the future. Allen and Garnett are not like Jason Kidd or Kobe Bryant who demanded trades just to get to a championship caliber team. why you also left out Derek Fisher? He also left the Utah Jazz to become a Laker again so that he can also win a champinoship ryt?
And if ever they really wanted a championship for their own glory, there’s nothing wrong about it. every player, superstar or a bench player he is, wants to win a title and winning an NBA title is a great achievement for every player who knows the game. maybe you didn’t know how to play the game or maybe you didn’t know what’s the feeling of being a champion???
i also agree with intsik that basketball is a team game and who ever wins the championship is deserving to win it, because they gave all their hearts out just to get that title. for a professional athlete, specifically an NBA player, winning a title is very precious to them because it shows your perseverance, hardwork and passion for the game.
derek fisher went back to LA and actually had a pay-cut because LA has the best medical facilities needed by his child. His top priority there is his child’s health and winning another championship is just a plus plus
I think were on the same page Blaze… well most of it…. 1 thing we really dont agree on is the kobe pushing to trade him….its unleader like… he’s the best player on the team like hakeem, but not the best leader on any other floor he steps in…. leaders dont quit…. if there are any kind of issue… you talk to higher people to help and do something… but you as the leader… dont quit…. wanting a ring… thats not a problem…. but by telling your management you dont to stay… its just plain selfish
oo tama nga c blade at inchik, wala kwenta snabi mo sa blog mr viellissimo!
wala namang team n nanalo ng championship and ndi deserving manalo. lakers man o celtics, kung cno man manalo sa kanila, they deserve it dahil binigay nila ang lahat ng kanilang makakaya pra lng makuha ung title. binibigay nila ang pawis at dugo nila ng buong-puso pra lamang maipanalo nila ang game.
kung sa NBA finals pa lang eh ndi mo na nkikita ang potential ng isang team gaya ng Celtics if ever they shall win the championship, i doubt na sa totoong buhay eh ndi mo rin makikita ang potential ng ibang tao na umangat. in short and tagalog terminology, masyado ka mapang-mata!
Damn… i messed up your names… i mean Blade and i are on the same page… not Blaze…
In contrary to the title of this blog itself, CELTICS WILL WIN. :p woohoo!!
and all i can is, “Fight for you opinions, but don’t believe that they contain the whole truth or the ONLY truth.”
wen you lead a team you just do it on court, and its a whole lot of different things outside the court. contract issues are separated from the playing court. . if u see kobe not giving his best while playing coz he asked to be traded then he is not a good leader. =) saying kobe is a good leader is purely base on what he does while playing alone. characteristics of a good leader differ in every profesion or needs. heck i can even say kobe is a rapist but the fact is, he still is a good leader and his teammates cAN guarantee it.
i’ve found your site during a search in google and i just couldn’t take my eyes on this blog by mr viellassimo.
maybe you’ve misjudged the C’s for their hardwork and perseverance. yeah, thay have the best trio in a team in the NBA today but the BIG3 can’t do it by themselves if they didn’t have the support of their teammatesand coaching staff who persevered and work hard since day 1.
you see basketball is a team game, you cannot win it if you are only popular, or if you are a superstar that doesn’t know what teamwork means.
i agree with what the other commenters in this blog said about who deserves to win the NBA title: its the team who has the heart and passion to achieve that ultimate goal.
a piece of advice mr viellassimo, watch the movie “Coach Carter” and maybe you’ll know the true value of teamwork, hardwork and perseverance and the true meaning and goal of playing basketball.
for blaze… you follow the leader… you make them your role model… if the leader quits… why wouldn’t the team? he quited on them when their down… a leader stay for the good and bad times…. talking to the management.. suggesting what to do is the best way to go through the rough times… not publicly quiting on them. On the court i guess he played like how he plays… but he wont play like a MVP if the team isn’t a contender… the management stuck with their plan… kobe quited…he played better because the team has a chance not the other way around…. he takes the role of a leader when its convenient…. that is unleader like… hehehe
as for candyman… i agree with you…a team wins the title not a player…. could you rent vielisimo a copy of “coach carter”? maybe that would help him understand!Ü
man you really are hard on kobe, everybody on his team, on nba, on USA team said that his such a good leader on floor. =)
quiting is such a strong word, if he did, u should not see him playing hard, motivating his teammates, stepping up, and being a leader by example “on court” by making good decisions and helping your team win. its just what you do during the game the reflects how good a leader you are coz ur only a bsketball player on court.. i think the leadership qualities your looking for is beyond the basketball court. =) you just dont mix one isue with another, what he does on court should only be the basis if he’s a good leader or not.
and him asking for a trade was a past issue, u move on man like everybody else did..=p
your just looking for a “good samaritan” figure as a leader and its not really needed to be that way, its just basketball and its done on court alone, its not life! hehehehe. if kobe is not a good leader, then give me some1 acceptable -who don’t have past issues, who is unblemish.? =)
“for blaze… you follow the leader… you make them your role model… if the leader quits… why wouldn’t the team?” <—–your judging his leadership ability base on misconducts outside the court. in nba, ability is top priority than quality. you get paid by ur ability and how productive you are and with your teammates trusting on that ability to lead them., not on how humble or martyr you are, loyalty may not be even a factor, coz its still business. so the issue should be about the leadership ability and not the leadership quality. get a pope if u want quality. =)
uhmm, and did the team quit w/ kobe as their leader? last time i check the lakers led by bryant are in the finals trying to defeat a better team. i guess that ends this. move on man hehehe
I know a lot of Kobe fans out there will never accept the leadership of Kobe being questioned…. but as I said before… He played great basketball after just the team succeeding…. he’s been the leader since the lakers getting better standing not before… he is only motivated when the results are good…. not leader-like quality.
On and off the court a leader must handle himself for the team… basketball not only reflects what you do on the court… off the court as the leader you motivate your teamates….and not the first one to surrender… morals are affected by your off court moves….
Kobe is said to be great on the court…. one quality of a leader…bad off the court records like rape cases, quiting on his team etc. Kobe fans judge his leadership by his play on the court.. which I think is wrong….. good plays or shouting on your teamates not make you a leader… that just makes you the best player on the team…. Kobe is a great player… but not a great leader…
Wow thanks. This is a feel good moment! I think I’ve made quite a stir in this blog of mine. lol.
Oh btw CANDYMAN, I’ve watched Coach Carter so many times. You don’t need to lend me one, I have 2 copies of it, one downloaded and one bought, and when I’m watching it, even without subtitles, I can preempt what they’re about to say. Did you watch Coach Carter? ‘Cause what I know is that they DON’T HAVE SUPERSTARS on that team, like Coach carter said, “then we’ll have new ones [referring to the ones who left after the contract proposals right?)”. Unlike the Celtics. They have three. Three legitimate SUPERstars. Three legitimate SUPERstars they rely on SO MUCH.
The Cs this season is a newly-formed team. Correct. They’re team is hardworking and dedicated. Certainly. But they were rewarded with two great superstars! They weren’t that “hardworking and dedicated” when they didn’t have Garnett and Allen! Don’t be hypocrites! We never even talked about Celtics’ hardwork and dedication last season. Now that’s just idiotic. You comment on my blog mainly because you want me to be corrected and I accept that, but I’m definitely sure that your reason is that of my opposite: Lakers shouldn’t win. You didn’t rely on the facts as much as I did. You just made your comments out of your desire for the Celtics to win. Plus, I’m a Mavs fan. It just shows the fact that I rely on facts, not my emotions. (and inchik, come on we all know you hated Kobe before, heck WE hated Kobe before!)
Of course the Celtics will be hardworking and dedicated now because of these three; “THEY can take us to the finals now.” If they were hardworking and dedicated, then why do they need these two just to get to the finals? If this season’s Minnesota Timberwolves or Portland Trail Blazers reached the finals, now that is a TRULY DESERVING CHAMPIONSHIP. Why? Because that’s real hardwork, without any superstars (Roy is a STAR). That’s dedication. They don’t rely on just three. They rely on ALL of them. Like what I’ve said, take out Garnett and Allen, let’s see where they’ll end up. But with respect to the C’s, this isn’t called hardwork or dedication, this is called, for their part, MOTIVATION.
Plus “how dare you made a blog like this?” “walang kwenta cnabi mo sa blog?”. I wrote this because that’s what I felt. Maybe you should have written Lakers shouldn’t win. Kung walang kuwenta, bakit mo pa binasa? tapos gagawa-gawa ka ng comment na mapang-mata ko? STFU eh kung di ka ba naman sira gago
Did you even read this in my blog: “From the tremendous but wonderful change of Kobe Bryant into a “real” leader …”? Meaning I didn’t justify Kobe’s leadership before, I’m talking about this season!.. I also agree that the BIG THREE also need their supporting players to win a game and that’s true. Why, doesn’t the Lakers need each other too? Come on man, I didn’t even criticize or undermine the Cs hardwork and dedication. And just like what you said, the Lakers didn’t expect to be in the finals during the start of the season. That’s exactly the point! They NEVER NEEDED the FINALS MOTIVATION just to be hardworking and dedicated. They were hardworking before and now. The Celtics ONLY DID WHAT YOU’RE SAYING after getting the two superstars!
Lastly, I’m pretty sure you were just carried on by your emotions by reading the title. You didn’t even read the whole thing! Why am I sure about this? ‘Cause none of you realized that I made a mistake about the Cs championship: it wasn’t 14, it should be 16 championships!
Hahaha, I never thought I’d be exchanging comments about basketball. I only do these on boxing websites!
wait wait wait…. one thing you keep pointing on is the dedication and hardwork….and your telling me celtics don’t have that? just because they have new super stars? whats the connection? first of all… maybe 80% works hard and dedicated in the NBA…but not as a team… or not talented enough to go through finals..
2nd don’t call us hypocrites if we dont side with you… first of all we like boston… but we never said that lakers shouldnt win…we said… who wins deserved it…
you still point out removing KG and ray…asking where will they be… maybe they will be fishing with kenny ryt now… but to be fair… how about you remove pau… will they even beat denver?
And you say the only team that is deserving is a team without a superstar? come on! superstar are not just picked up… they became 1 by performance or achievements… if ever Twolves reached the finals… Al will be their superstar… if you really watched coach carter and understood it… eventhough coach says that their team has no superstar… they have that super center that cant read… and a lot of more than half decent stars….
and also you say lakers didn’t even expect to be in the finals? and naturally hardworking? come on!!!! Since bynums consistency and flashes of dominance… they are already considered as a contender… and what stupid team with full of talents wouldn’t even be thinking they can reach the finals? Boston was motivated as the season started… maybe your right… its because they saw themselves in the finals… they had a goal…. but as the lakers saw the light also shining for them… that is the time they put their hardwork to another level…. so pointing out… the lakers is just the same as the Boston… so if boston isn’t deserving? lakers just the same. maybe you just need to watch boxing… where 1 man just wins it all….
We red all your your blog… not by our emotions… we expressed our opinion about the essence of your blog… we may not read as detailed as you are…. maybe thats just because men from studies doesnt care about details… they just want the direct point of everything….
commentators here talks about the game and fairness of the game… we may all have different opinions per team… but we are all agreeing that NBA’s system of choosing the champ is fair enough to pick the most deserving team…. a team that is compose of not 1 leader… but players… coaches and managements that does their jobs… to take the ultimate price….
please don’t curse on our blogsite…. use your ym and tell the person directly instead…. thank you!
-Management
y should a team be undeserving just because they added new stars, superstars,? what’s wrong with that? i thought the purpose of trade and signing free agents is to improve your team and hope that the ability, work ethics, dedication, etc, of the player your getting would be incorporated to the team and help them win games and ultimately, win championships. i just don’t get it.
to inchik, u really need a pope as a team leader.,hehehe nuf sed..
to mr. viellisimo, you wrote a somewhat offensive blog in a public blog site. and naturally offended people will react, if you can’t handle it well and can’t filter/choose the right words in your reactions then try writing blog with more discretion.
here we go again. did I say that the ONLY deserving teams are the ones without superstars?! weird, i didn’t find that in my comments.. you’re not gonna be a good proofreader if ever you’re gonna apply for one..
did I say you’re hypocrites because you didn’t side with me? I believe there’s no line in my comment saying that, even the figurative meaning of “don’t be a hypocrite” doesn’t point to that direction.. another completely off the point advice… i’m only pointing out that you’re hypocrites because you can’t admit the fact that SOMEHOW, SOMEWHERE in your heart and mind, you dislike the Lakers (Kobe for that matter).
remove pau gasol, yes they’ll beat denver. deal with it.
You can also find in my comment, “…Lakers didn’t expect to be in the finals DURING THE START of the season.” hihihi, you missed another one there…
anyway, we should accept that all of us who writes here are expressing their opinions for the love of writing and arguments. and that’s a good way of saying that this blog site is some good way of interaction (or bad)
oh, and don’t EVER advice me to just watch boxing and nothing else aight? ’cause i watch, play, and love basketball.
gee, i sense emotions bursting right now… and i assure you that i’ll be smiling after this. hihihi…
P.S. sorry for the bad words.
wohooo!! champion celtics!!
i almost ate my heart out a while ago. oh well… that’s a good thing too. congrats to the Boston Celtics.
i really expected Pierce to be finals MVP if they win. that was his moment.
Just waiting now for the next season. Just waiting for the Mavs to be on top again.
oh come on… proof reader? any one can read your comment… and say that you called us hypocrites, because of the arguments about the superstars…. we read, we react by what we understand from the things you trying to point out….I dont have to tell the words “your your gay” to imply that you are ryt? that’s just an example.. so don’t react…
And where the heck in your line points out that you called us hypocrites by hating the Lakers? not even a context clue….
Denver is being so belittled by you again…. have you ever thought that reactions flood you because you just side with another team and not even explain in any kind of pure sense to defend that?
I didn’t missed the ” …Lakers didn’t expect to be in the finals DURING THE START of the season.” thingy…. its just you defended the lakers from the allegation of candyman that boston worked harder than they are…. which i suggested that they worked as much as they did when they realized that they can win the ring…. come on… i know im not good at english but…but I ask a friend read it and he understood my point….
Why not advice you to watch just boxing? It’s an advice… you have the freedom to choose if you will take it… sheesh! besides… the sentence was clearly just a hypo for the laker kobe vs peirce for the deserving champs…
And you did said that the deserving teams are teams without superstar…. “If this season’s Minnesota Timberwolves or Portland Trail Blazers reached the finals, now that is a TRULY DESERVING CHAMPIONSHIP.” championship are given to one team and you chose two teams that has no supertar that you think is deserving… I questioned that logic… that for you they deserved more to win the ring than both laker and boston….
In no sense of twisting any words… i know we both have two different opinions on this topic… the only different with us is… you never defended yours…you just questioned our opinions by your so called proof reading abilities…
the management truly loves what you brought to this blog site… We give comments and our own opinion on some blogs… please don’t take it personally. We hope you blog with us again with the same intensity you bring to the readers… Thank you…. but I stick with my beliefs… coz u never pushed yours…
to intsik, tnx for helping me out on this issue and for defending what i’ve said from my recent comment on this blog. you’ve said it all what i should say so i will just say only one thing now:
WAHAHAHAHA TAMBAK ANG LAKERS!!!!!
CHAMPION ANG BOSTON!!!
now, is the celtics still don’t deserve to win after they massacred the lakers at The Garden???
whew! so much intensity. words thrown and in the end, they are just each other’s point of view. as i’ve quoted, those were opinions, not necessarily the truth. deserving or not, boston won! :p so just move on, see what the next season will be like and hope the team you like will be on top.
“now, is the celtics still don’t deserve to win after they massacred the lakers at The Garden???”
nice English grammar dude! lol
anyway, the boston celtics won. so i guess this is over then. congrats to them, and to you too!
well i just hope next year, the boston celtics will still be the team you’re supporting.
coz for me as of now, i return to being a Mavs fan.
we’re all looking forward to a greater season this November (or October?)
“now, is the celtics still don’t deserve to win after they massacred the lakers at The Garden???”
nice English grammar dude! lol” <—-
HOY KUPAL Kung mangiinis ka lng s mga nagcocoment d2 e tumigil tigil k nlng ok.
icp bata ka ha?
idefend mo ng aus blog mo,
kun di mo kya, gumawa ka ng private blog mo.
wg mo tirahin gramar at pagkatao ng iba pra idefend blog mo.
kung gs2 mo ng away ako sbhan mo, hndi un coment coment ka pikon k pla.
to candyman: keep posting ur coments.. =)
Let’s settle this in a very civilized manner ok???
First viellissimo the way you correct candyman’s grammar is quite offensive its like your telling him “Hahaha I’m smarter than you” pls correct his grammatical error in the most polite manner because some people like Chester didn’t like the way you reacted on his mistake(were just humans anyway i don’t want to act like a hypocrite but maybe it’s just a normal reaction by vielissimo maybe he doesn’t want to offend anybody vielissimo pls clear this out)….
Second everybody has different opinions no one can ever tell whose wrong or whose right but pls!!!!! Never imply that your opinion is always right Coz it causes havoc and a lot of people are being offended/enraged. Opinion is just an opinion not unless you have documents to prove what you say is a fact(we are future engineers right?we prove theories through laboratory testings and by getting RESULTS analyzing it blah blah making conclusions)….Some might think that the lakers deserves to win some aren’t so please respect other people’s opinion be mature enough to accept other people’s opinion(Make Love not war right??).Its becoming a “I’m better than you you can’t correct me” argument. I’m just insisting that you can’t make them think the way you want them to think that’s hard to do…..Humans are naturally a veeeeeeeeery very stubborn/self centered animal…..
Third We thank you for putting up a very interesting blog about NBA it is by far the most “flooded with comments” topic we encourage you to put up more topics like this, it doesn’t hurt to have a very healthy argument. I look forward to your next post but please be more discrete when replying to other people’s comment be more considerate on how other people might feel after reading your comment before spurring out your comments ok? And that applies to anyone whose posting on this blog…..NO HITTING BELOW THE BELT!!!!!!!!!!!!
NO “but he started it first” just try to understand him/her be more mature and act like an Older Brother who always forgives his younger brother/sister’s misdeeds.
I’m not on anyone’s side,
let’s just close this chapter,
Let go move on!Till next season right??PEACE!!!!!Inuman na!!!!
Go visit my chicks collection then wank all day!!!!hahaha
“Don’t be hypocrites! We never even talked about Celtics’ hardwork and dedication last season. Now that’s just idiotic.”
” tapos gagawa-gawa ka ng comment na mapang-mata ko? STFU eh kung di ka ba naman sira gago”
“i’m only pointing out that you’re hypocrites because you can’t admit the fact that SOMEHOW, SOMEWHERE in your heart and mind, you dislike the Lakers (Kobe for that matter).”
i say:
prangkahan lng,
kung pikon ka wg ka mgblog d2,
kun gusto mo pdin mgsulat pro pikon ka padin edi wg basahin mga comment lalo n magreact p
yan mga nsabi mo b nkatulong pra madefend ang mga sinulat mo?!? o madefend lng ang sarili mo at tirahin iba tao???
(are you helping to promote this site by saying those things?)
and you dont wash your hands by saying that you’re a mav’s fan and saying something about them(who cares? part b yan ng blog mo?)
pikon kna di mo p ndefend ng tama ang blog mo. kawawa ka nmn.
nagcocoment ang tao s blog mo, hindi s pagkatao mo!
kita n nga s unang comment what a weird blog dw, hndi nmn cnbing what a weird blogger.
kun naofend ka s mga nsabi ng iba s blog mo or naging patungkol p sau, kht cla ung mali, u need to HANDLE IT BETTER NEXT TIME.
(and you should know that, considering that you’re the righteous one who even laugh at the wrong grammar of candyman)
IT ALL STARTED WITH YOUR BLOG, and you should STICK WITH WHAT YOU HAVE WRITTEN WHEN GIVING AN ARGUMENT
~nuf sed.
oi ngkamali lng c candyman sa grammar inapi mo na mr viellissimo.. =(
actually mukha namang walang mali sa comment nya, i checked it sa MS Word 2003, at ayun ok naman.. cgro instead of “does”, “is” ung nlagay nya pro i don’t think wlang difference un ksi both are in the present tense and the statement naman is in the question form..
if you have a better sentence or grammar for the statement made by candyman, pls write it here in the blog so he’ll know..
“nagcocoment ang tao s blog mo, hindi s pagkatao mo!”
what about boy talim’s “masyado kang mapang-mata”? comment ba un tungkol sa blog ko?
im just saying, boy talim initiated this.
tska ewan ko kung ako lng, pero eto bang statement nato natutuwa lng o intensyon tlga mng-inis:
wohooo!! champion celtics!!;
lalo na to:
WAHAHAHAHA TAMBAK ANG LAKERS!!!!!
CHAMPION ANG BOSTON!!!
???!!
bka nmn sabihin nyo hndi yan mapang-inis. ewn ko lng, sakin lng un.
people living in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones. (mali ba?)
i never intended na mg-inis wen i sed ung comment ko about dat english grammar. para skin, tinanggal ko lng ung intensity d2 sa comments. ung first paragraph ni tapsilog, dats my exact explanation. pero lyk u said, hndi mo alam kung nkaofend ka na o hndi. pero as a result, nkaofend ako kaya ka nainis.
i never intended din to defend myself but to defend the blog itself. ung una kong comments, puro defense un sa blog. so i guess i just hit back nung later comments na. do we like others saying bad things like that even though it’s not true? ikaw b sabihin ko na ikaw ung pikon dahil sa mga comments mo na “HOY KUPAL” tska “Kng gs2 mo ng away…”, at hindi ako? hndi ka maasar?
i guess ayaw lng talaga nating magpalamang.
tska i just added that I’m a mavs fan para matapos na to, okay? again just read tapsilog’s comment. that’s my exact defense.
though, i agree with you. hndi ko talaga na defend 100% ung blog ko ng tama.
pero mali ka nung cnabi mo na puro sarili ko lng dinefend ko non. at pano mo naman nasiguro yun?! lagi ka ba tama?
well i guess i should handle it better next time then. that, accepted.
tnx tapsilog for the best reasoning here.
yes hail to tapsilog being the peace maker daw! wahahaha
ano ba yan! wag na magaway.. post lng ng post ng blogs. text nalang kayo huwag na dito magpersonalan.
MYSTIQUE nalang hehehe
“Kung walang kuwenta, bakit mo pa binasa? tapos gagawa-gawa ka ng comment na mapang-mata ko? STFU eh kung di ka ba naman sira gago”
—-> bakit ko pa binasa? sympre u wrote a wierd blog that looks interesting. sympre ang initial reaction ng tao basahin ung sinulat mo. tpos sinabi mo pa ako ngsimula eh una kang ngsabi ng obscene words, mas gago ka pla eh!
““nagcocoment ang tao s blog mo, hindi s pagkatao mo!”
what about boy talim’s “masyado kang mapang-mata”? comment ba un tungkol sa blog ko?”
—> pagkatao mo ba yan? ksma sa comment sa blog mo yan.. cympre kaw ngsulat ng blog mo eh alangan namang ndi ka rin punahin eh kaw ngsulat. just think it this way, sa mga dyaryo nga kinakasuhan ung ngsulat ng libel eh dahil npupuna ung mga sinusulat nila, kaw pa kya jan ndi mapuna ung sinulat mo. kya ko nsabi na mapang-mata ka.
“tska ewan ko kung ako lng, pero eto bang statement nato natutuwa lng o intensyon tlga mng-inis:
wohooo!! champion celtics!!;
lalo na to:
WAHAHAHAHA TAMBAK ANG LAKERS!!!!!
CHAMPION ANG BOSTON!!!
???!! ”
—->napikon ka naman sa statement na yan???
cla nagcocoment lng, ikw gumagawa ng blog?
it all started with your blog, kun d mo kaya handle mas maayos ang mga coment at gaganti ganti ka lng pg natamaan ka,edi wg k mgsulat.
ngyn ngeexplain ka ng mahinahon at tama. kaya mo pla e?!?
sna umpisa plng ginawa mo na. nagpakita ka sna ng pgkakaiba. hindi un mas masahol k p
mga tol,
cnu b nppikon?
ung statement na WAHAHAHAHA TAMBAK ANG LAKERS!!!!!
CHAMPION ANG BOSTON!!!. cnu b npikon dun? dba tinatanong ko nga kng ano tingin niyo dun?
all i’ve done was defend, defend, defend. that’s it. in fact while i’m writing all my comments here, i wasn’t mad or anything like that. tska nakita nmn natin kng cnu tlga napikon, nagalit at gumanti dba?
and yes, it all started with this blog. I agree. i really made a mistake NAMING the blog. mali ung title, masyado offensive. but not in making the blog.
plus i employ you to seek reason here. where in my blog can you find obscene words? if you can show me then maybe i really did start it, or even because of this blog. and yes, i MAY HAVE used obscene words, but that’s AFTER the comment made by Boy Talim. im sure you won’t disagree with me on that one.
besides my FIRST comment, ngayon lng b aq ngexplain ng mahinahon? i didn’t even use obscene words anymore right?i think you can find my comments calm and in an explanatory manner.
i’m quite expecting na you’ll agree with me sa lahat ng cnabi ko DITO sa comment na to. kc as i observe, i’ve explained my side of the story. i’ve made a mistake in some things, and i accept that.
ewan ko nlng sa inyo kng ayaw niyo accept na ngkmali kau sa ibang bagay. BAKA lng ayaw niyo tlga maprove na mali. if you can’t then that’s my problem no more.
peace!
lahat ng ngcoment d2 hindi mo masisisi at msasabing my ksalanan. kz nagcoment lng cla. blog mo to. kun d nla gs2 natural mgcocoment ng d maganda at malamang asarin ka pa.. ikw lng ang responsible d2 kz blog mo to. kun d mo kya mga aggressive n comments edi make safer blogs
hindi mali title ng blog mo, ang mali is pano mo hnandle mga nagcoment s blog mo. un lng. kun ano man nsabi sau o minura ka pa, show some class nmn. ngayon pa tol tol ka dhil meron ng agresive n kumakausap sau.
hndi ka b ngbabasa ng ibang blog? yang coment n “WAHAHAHAHA TAMBAK ANG LAKERS!!!!!
CHAMPION ANG BOSTON!!” kht s ibang blog d2 my mga gnyan tipo, pro nsau n un pano mo patulan. kagaya nga ng gnamit mong palusot n cnbi ni tapsilog s unang paragraph db? “maybe nobody wants to offend anybody”
bottom line: wlang isue kht ano p title ng blog mo, if u want to be agresive, its fine with us
and i personally think it would be much better,
(provided kya mo defend lahat ng cnbi mo, and its not even saying that ur right, but by just saying ur opionion and reasoning why u have said those things.) stick to ur blog, if you realize that you have written something wrong and its a “fact” then just admit it if my nagcomment kung wla then no problem, you get away with it., but if u r just writing your opinion then u can never be wrong with that.
khit murahin mo p lahat ng tao gusto mo s blog mo its up to you
what we want is good conversation(exemption is kun sobrang offensive tlga ng blog)
and intellectual arguments s mga comments.
at my magcocoment at my magcocoment ng di maganda.
show some class. iba tau e. kya nga ikaw ang gumagawa ng blog at cla nagrereact lng.
oo, tama and mga sinabi ni ginoong dela cruz sa kanyang inilathalang komento sa itaas.
sa madaling salita, nakagawa ka ng isang artikulo na produkto ng iyong nararamdaman na maaaring nakasakit ng damdamin o di kaya ay may napuna lamang sa iyong ginawang pahayag. natural na sa tao ang magkaroon ng reaksyon sa mga bagay-bagay sa kanyang paligid.
naiintindihan din namin ang iyong damdamin tungkol sa iyong artikulo at dalawang bagay lang ang masasabi ko sau aking kaibigan…
“hindi lahat ng tao ay kaya mong makuha ang loob”
sa ingles..
“you can’t please everybody”
at ang huli..
“ang kagandahan ay nasa mata ng tumitingin”
sa ingles..
“beauty is in the eye of the beholder”
Viellissimo didn’t think the boston celtics deserved to win because they have too many superstars while blade on the other hand thinks they are the rightful champions coz even though they don’t have the best player(kobe that is) they have enough force(with the big 3) to dominate the opposing team.
Two contradicting point of view that will never meet not in a million years,let us close this chapter and hope for the best for your favorite teams, Move on to the next season ok!!!Peace!!
There’s already a very calm conversation after a very heated debate I think this is enough to clear things out you all have explained your point and admitted your mistake that is good.
Any arguments(comments) beyond this point would be deleted!!!wahahahah I got the freaking moderator power!!!!!As carlito said before “I text mo nalang”
yupz, i dont need explanations here bkit dndefend sarili nila. just defend ur blog dats it.
to blade: wag kang patawa! hahahaha =p
cgro some “additional” expalanations will also be deleted by your truly,, -me. =)
Wooooohooooooo……
No comment.
Peace DUDE! =)
Its getting hot in HERE….
this is late but the guy who started this is stupid. ive been a garnett fan foreever and he is dedicated more to the game than any other player. Kobe lost HAHA, the Celtics defense was just way to good for the Lakers. I mean they couldnt even win all there games at home, PATHETIC. for a finals team they sure didnt play like one. GARNETTs contract finished he was a free agent so he took the offer. why are you complaining about him going to the celtics i bet you wouldnt have said anything about GARNETT if he would have take the offer from the lakers. plus the lakers got Gasol becuz they new KOBE COULDNT LEAD AND TAKE THE TEAM ON HIS OWN. LAST OF ALL, LIKE YOU SAID THE CELTICS STRUGLED AGAINST A YOUNG AND BAD HAWKS TEAM, SO NOW IF YOU LOOK AT IT IN YOUR WAY SINCE THE HAWKS LASTED 7 GAMES AND THE LAKERS 6 THAT MAKES THE HAWKS BETTER THAN THE LAKERS TEAM.